Will You Add?
#1 in Business Subscribe Email Print

You are here: Home > Legal > Intellectual Property > Intellectual Property: Community Trade Marks – Registration Refusal – Likelihood of Confusion

Tags

  • board
  • therefore
  • therefore refused
  • othersin compliance
  • search engines

  • Links

  • Avail the Opportunity of Becoming a Car Owner With a Car Loan
  • Strengthen Friendships With Ecards
  • A Beautiful Song And An Inspiration
  • Will You Add? - Intellectual Property: Community Trade Marks – Registration Refusal – Likelihood of Confusion

    Entrepreneurship Story; Over Regulation in Franchising Final Chapter
    Sally and Jim have launched their automotive franchise business and are now selling franchises; problems arise as lawyers and over regulation threaten to ruin their life’s work, see how it ends; tragedy or success. A realistic story of modern day franchising. . .Sally says “well we do not need to do site selection because we were going to go to that shop it is a great location, besides since Joe
    genuine use of TRIVASTAN was in respect of a medicinal product to treat vascular disorders of the eye, and it would be superfluous to require proof that the product was actually used by patients for this purpose;

    ▪ a likelihood of confusion results if the public might believe that the goods or services in question come from the same company;

    ▪ a likelihood of confusion is assessed based upon the perception of the public of the marks and goods and serv

    Why Boats Are A Pleasure... But You Still Need Boat Insurance
    One of the greatest pleasures that a man can have is owning his own boat. It goes back to the days of adventure on the high seas when a man was absolute monarch of his realm as a captain of his ship.Today there are very few places that the average man can be master and commander of his own destiny. But owning a boat is not without risk or expense. At one time cannons and carronades protected the
    In Alcon Inc v Of Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) [2005], a mark was refused registration because the public was likely to confuse the mark with another similar mark.

    In 1998, Alcon filed an application for registration of the word mark TRAVATAN in respect of goods within Class 5, in particular ophthalmic pharmaceutical preparations.

    In 1999, Biofarma SA filed an opposition against registration of TRAVATAN, arguing that there would be confusion with the word mark TRIVASTAN, registered in Italy in 1986. This earlier trade mark was also registered under Class 5 covering pharmaceutical, veterinary, hygiene products and others.

    In compliance with Article 42 of Regulation No 40/94, Alcon requested that Biofarma furnish proof that the TRIVASTAN mark been put to genuine use in Italy. Biofarma sent the requested documents to OHIM, demonstrating genuine use of TRIVASTAN in Italy.

    In September 2001, the Opposition Division of OHIM found that use of TRIVASTAN was proven in respect of a pharmaceutical product within Class 5. The Opposition Division therefore refused registration of TRAVATAN on the grounds that there was likely to be confusion because of the visual and phonetic similarities between the marks. Alcon appealed this decision to the Third Board of Appeal who also rejected the appeal on the same grounds as the Opposition Division. Alcon then applied to the Court of First Instance to annul the decision.

    Alcon claimed that:-

    ▪ Article 42(2) and (3) had been infringed because Biofarma failed to submit evidence of actual use rather than potential use of TRIVASTAN in respect of ophthalmic products; and

    ▪ there has been an infringement of Article 8(1)(b) because the goods at issue were not sufficiently similar.

    The Court of First Instance ruled that:-

    ▪ the evidence submitted by Biofarma demonstrated genuine use of TRIVASTAN was in respect of a medicinal product to treat vascular disorders of the eye, and it would be superfluous to require proof that the product was actually used by patients for this purpose;

    ▪ a likelihood of confusion results if the public might believe that the goods or services in question come from the same company;

    ▪ a likelihood of confusion is assessed based upon the perception of the public of the marks and goods and servi

    Where Are The Real Home Worker Jobs
    I am officially jealous of you if you're actively looking for home worker jobs. And here's why.When I started looking for exactly the same thing (and not too long ago either I should point out) I hadn't yet been made aware of the power of article directories. I did what you've probably just done...I entered "home worker jobs" into a search box on a search engines and that's how I started my resea
    n with the word mark TRIVASTAN, registered in Italy in 1986. This earlier trade mark was also registered under Class 5 covering pharmaceutical, veterinary, hygiene products and others.

    In compliance with Article 42 of Regulation No 40/94, Alcon requested that Biofarma furnish proof that the TRIVASTAN mark been put to genuine use in Italy. Biofarma sent the requested documents to OHIM, demonstrating genuine use of TRIVASTAN in Italy.

    In September 2001, the Opposition Division of OHIM found that use of TRIVASTAN was proven in respect of a pharmaceutical product within Class 5. The Opposition Division therefore refused registration of TRAVATAN on the grounds that there was likely to be confusion because of the visual and phonetic similarities between the marks. Alcon appealed this decision to the Third Board of Appeal who also rejected the appeal on the same grounds as the Opposition Division. Alcon then applied to the Court of First Instance to annul the decision.

    Alcon claimed that:-

    ▪ Article 42(2) and (3) had been infringed because Biofarma failed to submit evidence of actual use rather than potential use of TRIVASTAN in respect of ophthalmic products; and

    ▪ there has been an infringement of Article 8(1)(b) because the goods at issue were not sufficiently similar.

    The Court of First Instance ruled that:-

    ▪ the evidence submitted by Biofarma demonstrated genuine use of TRIVASTAN was in respect of a medicinal product to treat vascular disorders of the eye, and it would be superfluous to require proof that the product was actually used by patients for this purpose;

    ▪ a likelihood of confusion results if the public might believe that the goods or services in question come from the same company;

    ▪ a likelihood of confusion is assessed based upon the perception of the public of the marks and goods and serv

    Improving Your New Website
    You've got your website up and published, and you are proud of what you have accomplished.You have spent some time building links and getting noticed by search engines, but your stats show you that most of your visitors don't stay around very long! What can you do to make your site more attractive, and most of all, make your visitors want to return time and time again?If you have a retail
    on Division of OHIM found that use of TRIVASTAN was proven in respect of a pharmaceutical product within Class 5. The Opposition Division therefore refused registration of TRAVATAN on the grounds that there was likely to be confusion because of the visual and phonetic similarities between the marks. Alcon appealed this decision to the Third Board of Appeal who also rejected the appeal on the same grounds as the Opposition Division. Alcon then applied to the Court of First Instance to annul the decision.

    Alcon claimed that:-

    ▪ Article 42(2) and (3) had been infringed because Biofarma failed to submit evidence of actual use rather than potential use of TRIVASTAN in respect of ophthalmic products; and

    ▪ there has been an infringement of Article 8(1)(b) because the goods at issue were not sufficiently similar.

    The Court of First Instance ruled that:-

    ▪ the evidence submitted by Biofarma demonstrated genuine use of TRIVASTAN was in respect of a medicinal product to treat vascular disorders of the eye, and it would be superfluous to require proof that the product was actually used by patients for this purpose;

    ▪ a likelihood of confusion results if the public might believe that the goods or services in question come from the same company;

    ▪ a likelihood of confusion is assessed based upon the perception of the public of the marks and goods and serv

    The Ripple Effect of Fear
    Unemployment carries a lot of emotional baggage for most of us and fear is a major component. We fear the financial fallout of no longer receiving regular wages. We fear the impact of our lack of productivity on relationships: our marriage, our family, our friends, and our social and community activities. We fear losing the respect of our children when we can no longer give them what they need. We fear
    nstance to annul the decision.

    Alcon claimed that:-

    ▪ Article 42(2) and (3) had been infringed because Biofarma failed to submit evidence of actual use rather than potential use of TRIVASTAN in respect of ophthalmic products; and

    ▪ there has been an infringement of Article 8(1)(b) because the goods at issue were not sufficiently similar.

    The Court of First Instance ruled that:-

    ▪ the evidence submitted by Biofarma demonstrated genuine use of TRIVASTAN was in respect of a medicinal product to treat vascular disorders of the eye, and it would be superfluous to require proof that the product was actually used by patients for this purpose;

    ▪ a likelihood of confusion results if the public might believe that the goods or services in question come from the same company;

    ▪ a likelihood of confusion is assessed based upon the perception of the public of the marks and goods and serv

    The Importance of Giving Accurate Information on Health Insurance Quote Forms
    Are you a Jacksonville resident who is looking to purchase health insurance for yourself or your family? If you are, you will likely turn to health insurance quotes, as they can give you a good idea as to how much money you would have to pay to buy a particular insurance plan. When it comes to filling out a Florida health insurance Jacksonville quote, it is extremely important that you answer all of y
    genuine use of TRIVASTAN was in respect of a medicinal product to treat vascular disorders of the eye, and it would be superfluous to require proof that the product was actually used by patients for this purpose;

    ▪ a likelihood of confusion results if the public might believe that the goods or services in question come from the same company;

    ▪ a likelihood of confusion is assessed based upon the perception of the public of the marks and goods and services in question; and

    ▪ the signs in question were visually and phonetically similar and there was a high degree of similarity between the products which would result in a likelihood of confusion.

    The application was therefore dismissed.

    Comment: Ensure that a sought trade mark will not be confused with another mark in regards to the type of product or actual mark.

    Email: enquiries@rtcoopers.com

    © RT COOPERS, 2006. This Briefing Note does not provide a comprehensive or complete statement of the law relating to the issues discussed nor does it constitute legal advice. It is intended only to highlight general issues. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to particular circumstances.

    For help with registering your trade mark please contact us at enquiries@rtcoopers.com

    HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
    <a href="http://www.atriclecheck.com/article/130168/atriclecheck-Intellectual-Property-Community-Trade-Marks--Registration-Refusal--Likelihood-of-Confusion.html">Intellectual Property: Community Trade Marks – Registration Refusal – Likelihood of Confusion</a>

    BB link (for phorums):
    [url=http://www.atriclecheck.com/article/130168/atriclecheck-Intellectual-Property-Community-Trade-Marks--Registration-Refusal--Likelihood-of-Confusion.html]Intellectual Property: Community Trade Marks – Registration Refusal – Likelihood of Confusion[/url]

    Related Articles:

    Infomercial Creation: Design To Sell

    A Practical Guide to Choosing a Payment Processor for Your Adult Site

    Credit Or Debit - Which One is Best?

    Bookmark it: del.icio.us digg.com reddit.com netvouz.com google.com yahoo.com technorati.com furl.net bloglines.com socialdust.com ma.gnolia.com newsvine.com slashdot.org simpy.com shadows.com blinklist.com